WebDiscussing the undiscussable with the powerful: why and how faculty must learn to counteract organizational silence Dialogue is essential for transforming institutions into learning organizations, yet many well-known characteristics of academic health centers (AHCs) interfere with open discussion. WebThe New Yorker’s longtime dance critic, Arlene Croce, “reviewed” Bill T. Jones’s Still/ Here in absentia for its December 26, 1993/January 2, 1994 issue. In a long essay entitled …
The Art Of Victimization - Newsweek
WebIn December 1994, the veteran New Yorker dance critic Arlene Croce published a polemical piece of criticism that assumed the form of a nonreview, an essay-length argument marked by a spectrally present-if otherwise unilaterally refused-object of inquiry at its core. In her "Discussing the Undiscussable," Croce details WebJun 18, 2014 · Arlene Croce, " Discussing the Undiscussable, " in Writing in the Dark, Dancing in The New Yorker (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 2000), 708–19. Mark Morris Comes to Town 458 syncurl
Thinking and WriTing abouT bodies - JSTOR
WebJun 6, 2016 · Jones and his late partner, Arnie Zane, performing excerpts of “Valley Cottage” for the photographer Lois Greenfield in 1981. And yet, Jones has also been critiqued with uncommon rancor. In her... WebIn 1994, she courted controversy with her stance on Bill T. Jones"s Still/Here, a work about terminal illness. In an article called "Discussing the Undiscussable," she dubbed the work "victim art" and refused to attend any performances, claiming that it was "unreviewable." The article was reprinted in her 2000 book, Writing in the Dark. WebComments on "Discussing The Undiscussable", an essay by Arlene Croce, The New Yorker, December 26, 1994/January 2, 1995, pp. 54-60. Croce makes the assumption … sync-up 意味